Ian McLean QSO: The Grey Rhino of Population Decline
- Administrator

- Jan 30
- 3 min read
New Zealand faces a grey rhino event. We now feel the impact of the NZ birth rate dropping.
Across the world it’s happening. Birth rates are well below replacement. Workforces are tightening. Populations are ageing. The cost of pensions and healthcare is rising.
We in New Zealand rely heavily on immigration to staff hospitals, farms, and core services, but global competition for skilled workers is intensifying. Richer countries are scrambling for skills. Immigration can no longer be relied on to solve our problems.
The global nature of the change is obvious but unrecognised. That is called a ‘grey rhino event’.
Awareness of the impact of low fertility has risen, country by country, over the past year or so. Yet it is still almost always framed as a national problem rather than a global one. Each society sees its birth rate falling and assumes its predicament is unique. In fact, the pattern is shared across most of the world. The global nature of the shift is obvious once seen, but rarely acknowledged.
New Zealand treats these pressures as local issues. They are not. Our future will be shaped by the global population shift, even as our own policies determine how well we adapt to it.
For much of the twentieth century, the world population grew faster each year, in exponential growth. That changed about 1964. Since then, growth has slowed steadily, driven mainly by falling birth rates rather than falling death rates.

Country by country, population growth is turning into decline. What is happening now is the mirror image of twentieth century population growth, operating in reverse across generations.
The key measure is the Total Fertility Rate, the average number of children a woman is expected to have. A Total Fertility Rate of about 2.1 is needed for long term population stability. Around two thirds of the world’s population now live in countries below replacement fertility, including China and India. Populations in East Asia are already shrinking. So too in Europe, although some countries are partly protected by immigration. Sub Saharan Africa remains above replacement, but there too fertility is falling.
Because of population momentum, total world population has yet to peak and will not do so for another 50 years or so. But momentum works both ways. Fewer babies today mean fewer mums tomorrow. If fertility stays low, decline becomes self-reinforcing.
This downturn differs from earlier population falls caused by famine, disease, or war. It is driven by social change: rising prosperity, education, urbanisation, lower child mortality, and access to contraception. It reflects women’s choices as they have gained greater control over their lives.
There are benefits. Slower growth eventually eases environmental pressure. But fewer babies today mean fewer workers tomorrow. Labour shortages emerge long before total population falls. Populations age. Pension systems and health services come under strain.
New Zealand already feels the first ripples. Our population still grows because of immigration and demographic momentum, but births are well short of those needed to avoid long term decline. Skill shortages are already acute.
Global competition for workers will intensify. Richer countries are bidding for the same shrinking pool of talent and can outbid us for our own skilled people. We need to build the skills of our own people and then retain them, rather than rely on immigration.
Fewer young people are available to support the growing proportion of older folk. The costs of healthcare and New Zealand Superannuation are rising and increasing pressure on government finances.
New Zealand needs a plan. No part of the existing government system is equipped to provide one. A task force is needed to develop an integrated response. We need to repeat the successful approaches of the Woodhouse Commission on ACC, and the Picot Committee’s Tomorrow’s Schools.
The likely elements are already clear. Productivity will have to rise through innovation and technology. Economic growth per head will need to be strong enough to sustain living standards and support an ageing society with a smaller workforce. To eventually halt population decline, the role of women needs to be enhanced and parenthood supported much better.
We also need to take account of the long term prospects. Because the current fertility decline is unprecedented, long‑term outcomes are hard to predict. But the projections of current trends are frightening. These projections are not forecasts but they show what happens if nothing changes.

Civilisation may not unravel with a bang. It may shrink generation by generation, empty cradle by empty cradle. The first ripples are already affecting New Zealand. New Zealand needs to plan for the consequences of falling global fertility.
Ian McLean QSO
Rotorua
January 2026
Problem is a lot of the population we are producing is feral, so will not help productivity
Mass immigration is national suicide - just look at Europe and the UK in particular if you need evidence. Governments that allow this to prop up their economies and influence elections are pathetic. So lets not panic.
This isn't the problem it appears to be - the solution is to engineer economies to fit the changing demographics. This is also known as right sizing... and must be our way forward over time.
In the space of the next few decades we are going to need:
fewer roads for smarter means of mobility
teaching as a profession will decline as numbers dwindle - who needs to learn anything when all knowledge is instantly available.
farming methods will evolve to cope for…
GenAI (AI generally) is already increasing productivity and will continue to do so. We don't need "university graduates" of the kind being produced now in New Zealand. We do NOT need more lawyers or media "studies" graduates and we don't need unskilled, unemployable migrants of any kind.
We do need trained and skilled artisans (mechanics, nurses, plumbers etc..)
Finally, lower populations can and will be supported by greater use of AI and robotics.
Future economies need to find an alternative to population growth as the basis for prosperity. Too often the solution to economic woes is more children.
Two massive issues are hardly ever addressed in discussions on population:
Just how many humans can this planet support. Really.
Health
Years ago I was interested to see an article in an old Scientific American on how many humans could planet Earth support if every single human lived as hunter gatherers. The answer is around 10 million (I was so stunned I checked with other research, It was consensus). That's 0.01 billion.
Now we are past 8 billion and merrily heading our way to a few billion more. That is possible because of techniques like…
It's a conundrum alright....but the unarguable fact of the matter remains in regards to skilled workers such as tradesmen/women, doctors, nurses....the list is endless..and.we simply don't have the capability to magically produce homegrown solutions to these shortages any longer. We desperately need people to fill the void left by our own populace who are, to put it very bluntly, to lazy to participate because of a more than generous welfare system that seems to almost encourage an "opt out" clause through giving the work ready any excuse and endless carrots with no stick , and dress this up as " jobseeker".
What a bloody rort.
If we don't want people coming here because of a skill shortage, and I've seen…