top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

DON BRASH: Let New Zealand decide the future of Māori seats

The following is written in Don's capacity as Hobson's Pledge trustee


At Hobson’s Pledge, our position has always been clear and unwavering: it is time to abolish the Māori seats in Parliament.


Our reasoning is straightforward. In a modern, healthy democracy, citizens succeed on merit - not ancestry.


And right now, Māori MPs are already achieving incredible success in their own right, winning general electorate seats and earning high list rankings across the political spectrum.


That is exactly how a functioning democracy should work.


What is not a sign of a healthy democracy is reserving seats for one group of people based entirely on race or on when their ancestors arrived.


Let’s not forget history here: In 1986, the Royal Commission on the Electoral System explicitly stated that Māori seats should be abolished if MMP was adopted. Well, MMP arrived - but the seats remained.


Not only are these separate seats a relic of the past, but they are now being actively exploited by activists to skew our wider political landscape.


Take a look at what activist Katrina Smit recently wrote in e-Tangata. She openly called on voters to jump from the Māori roll to the General roll for the sole purpose of tactically ousting centre-right MPs—specifically targeting National’s Chris Bishop in Lower Hutt.



Her cynical logic? The Māori seats are guaranteed to go to Te Pāti Māori or Labour anyway, so why not weaponise the General roll to manipulate the overall election outcome?


For years, activists have encouraged Māori to move onto the Māori roll on the basis that it would strengthen Māori political representation and increase the number of Māori seats. But for the next two elections, that isn't true, and so the strategy has changed. 


The number of Māori electorates is fixed at seven until at least 2032, regardless of how many people are on the Māori roll. Thanks to changes in the way electorate boundaries are calculated, there will be no increase or decrease in Māori seats before then. That means Māori voters can switch to the General roll without affecting the number of Māori electorates at all. 


In other words, for the next two elections, Māori activist voters can have their cake and eat it too: retain all seven Māori seats while also gaining influence in closely contested general electorates. 


This is an outrageous situation. It proves beyond a doubt that these race-segregated seats are no longer just an outdated relic of the past - they are actively being used to distort our democracy.


It is also worth mentioning that there are Māori in every party in Parliament right now and 30% of the Cabinet are Māori.


Remember, the number of Māori seats isn't even based on how many people choose to sign up for the Māori roll; it’s based on total population statistics. It is a rort built on a rort, and it undermines the core democratic principle of "one person, one vote."

The time for special seats is over.


New Zealanders are fair-minded people, but we have had enough. Polling shows it, and the tens of thousands of you who have signed our petitions prove it. Now, we need the coalition government to step up and act.


We are launching our major new campaign: REFERENDUM NOW.


It is time to hand the talking stick back to the people of New Zealand and put this issue to bed once and for all.

 
 
 

27 Comments


Cameron Hunter
Cameron Hunter
2 days ago

What possible reason could Maori find to believe Dr. Brash's idea of a "healthy democracy" would fairly serve their interests? The deluge of legislation enacted over the last 180 years with the intention of depriving Maori of their article 2 Treaty guarantees or undermining their status within the agreement,provides ample evidence of its failure.


While Maori are represented in every Political Party and comprise 30% of Cabinet may well be statistically correct, the inference that their allegiance to their people surpasses that of their loyalty to their respective Party ideology is ridiculous. With the possible exception of the late Hon. Dame Tariana Turia, none have voted against their party on an issue of Maori significance.

This instance in isolation underscores…


Like
Replying to

KAWHARU’S RE-WRITTEN TREATY


In 1986, the Lange Labour Government commissioned Professor Sir Hugh Kawharu, Professor of Maori Studies at the University of Auckland, to produce a contemporary back translation of Te Tiriti’s Maori text.


Kawharu had just been appointed to the Waitangi Tribunal, a highly influential role he would hold for 10 years from 1986.


At the time of this appointment, Kawharu was also a claimant on behalf of Ngati Whatua, working on his tribe’s various Treaty claims, and representing it in the Bastion Point land claim negotiations.


Hardly someone without an axe to grind. Many might also recognise several conflicts of interest.


We might also ask why a further back-translation was needed, when TE Young’s 1869 back-translation compiled for…


Like

Facts

Those Maori seats were established as temporary. They were recommended to be disestablished when MMP was introduced. Ancestral privilege is totally contrary to Democracy.

Neither a National or Labour government will disestablish the Maori seats.

No citizen's initiated referendum has ever been accepted by a National or Labour government. Referenda are not liked by National or Labour governments unless they are confident they will get the result they desire. A non-binding referendum is not a real one.


There are a very samll number of influential members and significant donors in both the National and Labour parties. Those party elites make the decisions that their elected or appointed politicians impose on the rest of us.

It is assumed that our governments will always be by…


Like

winder44
winder44
3 days ago
Like

Allen Jones
Allen Jones
3 days ago

I note that the jounalist of the year Mike Hosking does not raise this issue with Luxon at their regular b/casts. Why not.

Like

Ian Boag
Ian Boag
3 days ago

So they go on the general role and electorate vote anything but Nat. So - if it comes to anything - that's one less Nat electorate MP and one more Nat list MP. Whoopdee doo.

Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page