RODNEY HIDE: What is the New Zealand government's Debt Limit?
- Administrator

- May 5
- 2 min read
Sir Niall Ferguson’s “Ferguson limit” is the point at which a nation spends more on debt interest than on defence. Cross it and the fiscal arithmetic begins to erode the ability to project power or even maintain basic sovereignty. The United States crossed it for the first time in nearly a century in 2024. New Zealand beat them to it.
Our latest numbers are damning. Core Crown interest payments are running at around $8.9 billion a year. Defence spending sits at roughly $3.3 billion. We are not close. We are already deep into Ferguson territory. Interest alone now dwarfs law and order spending as well. The debt service bill is larger than entire departments.
This is not a temporary spike. It is the logical result of decades of structural deficits, an ageing population, low fertility and the political cowardice that MMP encourages. Even under a centre-right Coalition we are still adding to the pile. Support parties demand their slice. Operating allowances get eaten by pre-commitments. The can gets kicked.
Ferguson’s warning is clear: once interest crowds out defence and essential services, the decline accelerates. Resources flow to bondholders instead of capability. Strategic choices narrow. The state becomes a pension administrator with a military hobby on the side.
Compare us to Australia. Their debt-to-GDP is lower, their interest burden more manageable and their defence spending more credible relative to the books. The UK and Canada are strained but still have more fiscal headroom than we do. Small, open economies like New Zealand cannot afford to live like Italy or Greece. Yet here we are.
The Rogernomics era under First Past the Post showed what is possible. A government with a majority could take hard decisions, cut spending, deregulate and bring the books back toward balance. MMP makes that almost impossible. Every Budget is a negotiation. Every cut is a veto opportunity for a support partner looking for political capital.
We crossed Ferguson’s limit with our eyes open. The data has been screaming for years. The solution is not another fiscal rule or another clever accounting trick. It is structural. Cut non-core spending ruthlessly. Sell assets that have no strategic justification. Flatten taxes to encourage growth instead of more borrowing. Most importantly, face the demographic reality: without higher fertility and a culture that values children, the welfare state is unsustainable.
New Zealand once led the world in reform. We can do it again — but only if we stop pretending coalitions can deliver discipline. They cannot. The debt interest bill is the proof. Time to choose: keep kicking the can or fix the system that keeps filling it. The Ferguson limit is not a warning. It is the verdict.
Rodney Hide is a former Minister and ACT party leader
Has to be some reason why we should get excited about the opinion of a kighted Pom economist who has moved to the US? Perhaps you have some other folk you can quote who say the same thing?
Rodney
Why have you been sitting on your fat arse hatching this story for the last God knows, how many years?
Perhaps you have remedial action tucked up your sleeve? If so please divest at first opportunity.
No airey_fairy stuff, real meat and potato remedy, please....and no cutesy stories about how you are now in literary retirement,!
This cat is out of the bag....and we want answers..PRONTO!
.
I agree with Rodney.
MMP mostly just allows people that no-one voted for to goven them. It also encourages people that disagree with the elites of the 2 main parties to start little new parties that are a waste of time and energy.
I think there were about 19 parties in the last election. Our government is still by the representatives of the National party.
Spending more than one can afford is the road to ruin for individuals and nations as well. Soliciting votes by promises of more largess from the public purse is not democracy.
Defense only works if we know and understand who the enemy is and how to effectively defend ourselves from them?
I keep asking "who is the enemy".…
Is Rodney proposing we should vote for one of the two main parties in order to get a single party government?
Rodney I am not sure how a little country like NZ can project power irrespective of its defence budget spend but I take your point.
There is another study that is perhaps more instructive and pertinent for sovereign nations and that is the study circa 2015 that Ken Rogoff, a prominent Harvard Economist and Carmen Rheinhardt, a former World Bank Chief Economist did on debt to GDP ratios.
Their findings were that when the debt to equity ratio surpassed around the 90% to 100% mark, the marginal utility of debt, (that is the keynsian theory of debt financing where you borrow a dollar to make two dollars), turns negative and that once countries reach that level of debt they basically…