top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

RODNEY HIDE - The Wrong Journey: Erica Stanford’s Sex Education Failure

I have been impressed by just how disgusted parents are by what our Minister of Education Erica Stanford has the schools teaching our kids about sex. It’s easy to see why the radicals pushing this material don’t want parents to know what is being taught.


The Ministry’s official Year 9 resource, *Navigating the Journey: Relationships and Sexuality Education*, produced by Sexual Wellbeing Aotearoa, is a glossy 196-page document. It is not a balanced, cautious guide to growing up. It is heavily weighted toward exploring “gender identity,” “sexual orientation,” “diversity,” and critical discussions around pornography and sexting. Students are encouraged to view gender as largely self-defined and to explore “diverse attitudes and values about sex.”


The underlying message is clear: everything is up to the individual. Whatever you want, so long as you get consent, take precautions, get regular check-ups, and here’s how you get an abortion if needed. It is even suggested that age should be no real barrier because the police will rarely prosecute. Marriage gets one mention — only to explain that rape can occur within it.


Even the most open-minded and liberal parents sense that something is not quite right here. They might not view sex as especially sacred, but deep down they understand that it has a purpose. It is written into human nature: sex is for bonding a man and a woman together in a stable relationship and for producing and raising children. That purpose gives sex its meaning, beauty, and seriousness.


Yet for the authors of "Navigating the Journey", that very purpose seems to be treated as the downside — something to be worked around with consent forms and medical procedures rather than embraced as the natural telos of human sexuality.


This is the inevitable result of abandoning any shared understanding of human purpose. As Alasdair MacIntyre explained in *After Virtue*, once societies reject the idea that human life has natural ends and directions, morality collapses into pure emotivism — “I feel this is right for me.” That thin, subjective framework is exactly what is being taught to our children at the most vulnerable and formative stage of their development.


We are telling 13-year-olds that their bodies have no inherent direction, that biological sex is optional, and that the highest standard for sexual behaviour is mutual consent and personal pleasure. Then we act surprised when youth mental health collapses, identity confusion soars, and stable relationships become harder to form.


Minister Stanford needs to be asked these hard questions: Why is her ministry promoting resources that treat biological reality and the natural purpose of sex as outdated? Why are we allowing ideology to replace truth at such a young age? And why are we steering children into confusion and calling it education?


Our young people deserve far better. They deserve honesty about their bodies, clarity about human nature, and guidance toward genuine flourishing — not ideological experiments dressed up as “relationships education.”


Rodney Hide is a former Minister and ACT leader

 
 
 

102 Comments


Liz M Lambert
Liz M Lambert
4 days ago

Bravo Mr Hide

Edited
Like
Replying to

Hi Liz In a way we are all talking to ourselves on these digital "platforms" because there is no real connection and discussion of the causes and solutions for the issues that are raised by the individiuals who are permitted to raise them.

Like

Macademia
Macademia
4 days ago

Could someone please stop Andrew Flanagan talking to himself?

Like
Andrew Flanagan
Andrew Flanagan
4 days ago
Replying to

I scrolled comments, to realise You have added Nothing to discussion - Be Better!

Like

evinshir
4 days ago

This is blantant misinformation. These teaching materials are not provided by the Ministry of Education.


Schools are free to use whatever materials they choose, and this set of materials are provided by a third party. Schools are choosing it because it is well researched and presented. They can opt to ignore modules as they want.


So your rant here is founded on fiction. Furthermore sex education isn’t just for “sex” but for all the elements associated with puberty and sexual identity.


The fact of the matter is that gay people and trans folk exist. And some teenagers are trans. The educational materials do not encourage anything and only provide schools with the resources to be able to appropriately navigate a…


Like
evinshir
a day ago
Replying to

Yes. I do believe that because that is literally how it works. The MOE do not influence what schools choose for their sex education materials. They provide their own materials to schools with recommendations. What Rodney is talking about is not the materials provided by the MOE. So either your teachers don't exist or they don't know what they're talking about. Gender Critical is the term used by gender critical folk. And they are a minority because the biological facts show that sex is not binary but bimodal, which means that there can be people of either sex, both, or none. Gender as a concept has been around for millennia - which is why different cultures have multiple gender roles. Some…


Like

Maybe, start from the basics facts to design education about sex and reproduction?

The desire to reproduce is basic unconscious instinct that enables the survival of a species. Engaging in sexual intercourse is not a practical and rational decision.

It is a basic primal urge that can be managed by rational thinking or not.

The result is that the female of the mating pair becomes pregnant and a new individual of the species will develop in her uterus. Those new individuals are the future of the species that have to be protected, provided for and taught how to survive in their environment, so that they can also reproduce when they are adults.

Rearing children is more successful when the benefits of both…

Like

ken
ken
4 days ago

Rodney, What makes you think the Minister is in charge of what happens? The Public Service has dominated what happens, policy be damned. Until this gets fixed howling at the government is a waste of time. If parliament is sovereign they need to regain control.

Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page