top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

PETER WILLIAMS: The BSA's digging its own grave

Two decisions highlight the need for its rapid disestablishment


If more evidence was needed about the relevance or irrelevance of the Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) then a couple of judgements they made this week have rammed home the point.


The decision about Sean Plunket on The Platform has been widely reported and commented on.


My take is simple.


Firstly, Plunket calls tikanga mumbo jumbo. It might be a colloquial and rudimentary description of an undefined spiritual concept but it’s true. Just like Christianity, Hinduism and Islam and every other religion. There’s no harm in one having a belief in any spiritual concept but if others disagree with the concept of such belief then in the free, liberal and open democracy that we enjoy we’re allowed to express that disagreement.


Two, the Broadcasting Standards Authority has no jurisdiction over an online, internet content producer. For The Platform, as is the case with Joe Rogan or Tucker Carlson, the BSA has no control over. Yes, its content originates in New Zealand but it’s available for consumption all over the globe wherever the world wide web can be accessed.


The jurisdiction of the BSA is self-evident in its very name. Broadcasting.


Therefore their call on Plunket was just plain wrong. Very wrong.


But even more disturbing is the BSA decision on a Newstalk ZB broadcast from April of this year. It was a talkback show inviting listeners to either call or text. One text came from an unidentified listener and the host, Francesca Rudkin, read it out.


“Israel is running the show and 80% of advisers around Trump are Jews. A Jew gifted $250 million to Trump personally at his electioneering time and he took it happily. Rubio is heavily linked to the Jewish community and society.”


Ms Rudkin read the text, as you do, made no comment on it, and moved on to the next call or text. Standard procedure for a talkback host. Been there, done that.


But in a majority decision released this week the BSA said the message “clearly evoked negative tropes about Jewish people, and that reading it without challenge served to embed those negative stereotypes.”


Ah, excuse me?


Chair Suzie Staley and another BSA member Aroha Beck, according to Stuff, “found the comment carried a clear implication that Jewish people as a collective were wielding control and influence over the US Government.”


To their credit a couple of BSA members John Gillespie – my old boss at 1News – and bloodstock entrepreneur Karen Fenton-Ellis dissented from the decision.


Presumably it was Staley’s casting vote which made the decision a majority one.


The big issue I have with the decision and the content of the text is a factual one.


While it may be an overstatement that “Israel is running the show” the reality is that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Donald Trump in the White House five times in 2025. No other foreign leader enjoys such access to the POTUS.


The “80 percent of advisers around Trump are Jews” is again an overstatement but it is a fact that many of his key officials like Stephen Miller, Howard Lutnick, Steve Witkoff and his trusted son-in-law Jared Kushner are Jewish.


It is a declared fact that Miriam Adelson, widow of casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, has donated $250 million to Trump and Republican Party causes during his Presidential campaigns.


Secretary of State Marco Rubio has close ties to the Jewish community because of his acceptance of donations from Sheldon Adelson and the Jewish car sales billionaire Norman Braman who was Rubio’s primary financial backer during his rise to become a US Senator from Florida.


Remember too that the US is paying Israel $3.8 billion a year under the 2019-2028 Bilateral Memorandum of Understanding purely for military aid and missile defence programmes.


The above are facts.


The texter to Newstalk ZB was not stating anything controversial.


The BSA decision on a complaint which obviously came from a listener sympathetic to the Jewish cause was nonsensical and flew in the face of journalistic integrity. For that reason I’m heartened that John Gillespie was a dissenting voice.


Newstalk ZB were given no fine or ordered to issue an apology. It was a the lightest of slaps on the wrist with the wettest of bus tickets.


It was a waste of the BSA’s time and taxpayers’ money.


It’s another reason to disband the BSA as quickly as possible.


Writer and broadcaster for half a century. Now watching from the sidelines. Subscribe to Peter William's Substack here

 
 
 

23 Comments


j.mcobbald
9 hours ago

Just another bunch of "wokes" sitting around trying to justify their reason for being there, BSA is BS.

Like

Bruce McKenzie
Bruce McKenzie
12 hours ago

You highlight one of the three reasons why I will not be voting National this time around. Disbanding of wasteful wokester bureaucracies such as BSA was a major promise by National yet indecisively acted upon..


Edited
Like
Tall Man
10 hours ago
Replying to

You and the 34% of bludgers may have more in common than you would think.

Like

N D
N D
a day ago

Get Rid of anything that is wasting New Zealanders money its way overdue to have a clean sweep. Would be good to know the incoming government would do just that all of them at once start off with a clean slate and more money for NZ to cover the essential NZ needs.

Sayonara Paris agreement, WEF, WHO, Work Shy politicians (they know the ones we mean) TV channels and Radio that spout misinformation, maorification and those that support it, government departments still using it, Waitangi Tribunal and those altering out History. Leave only the truth sayers.

Like
Tall Man
10 hours ago
Replying to

It is very hard to engineering a soft landing after a recession but there are some very easy decisions that could have been taken, should have been taken but were not taken.

Like

aristan
a day ago

So you think that the text message didn’t evoke negative tropes about Jewish people, or that it is not a negative thing to say Jewish people as a collective were wielding control and influence over the US Government?

Like
Tall Man
10 hours ago
Replying to

Of course it does, so what? It wasn't the presenter's opinion, it wasn't portrayed as fact it was just a comment that you may or may not take offense to. Your choice. Why is someone else responsible for your choice?

Like

Mick
a day ago

Agree Peter. Time these wokester, control freaks were sent packing.

Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page