top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

CHRIS McVEIGH - Dame Jacinda: hit or myth?

A small part of me wants to take some pride in the bestowing of an honorary degree by Oxford University on our former PM, Dame Jacinda Ardern. However I can't quite escape the feeling that I'm watching the equivalent of a Michelin star being awarded to our local Kentucky Fried Chicken outlet. I know that's a little unfair because their hot'n' spicy chicken wings with a side of potato and gravy is actually pretty damn good but I think that even that old huckster Colonel Sanders would agree that they'd be unlikely to trouble the gastronomer's inspectorate.


But not so Dame Jacinda. She's happy to bask in the almost slavish devotion bestowed on her by the world's pillars of higher learning, not to mention the equally fawning reception to her book and her movie and that's before we even get started on the many speaking engagements and panel discussions featuring her 'new kind of power' (is it just me or does this sound suspiciously like a solution she's peddling to global warming?).


And why shouldn't she take advantage of the world's seemingly inexhaustible appetite for shameless self promotion? As the celebrated American journalist H.L. Mencken famously quipped 'No-one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.' Or as the showman and circus impresario P.T. Barnum perhaps more pithily put it 'There's a sucker born every minute.' If our erstwhile PM can use it to her advantage by trading in on this universal desire to listen to the siren call of someone's solo trumpet being blown, then good luck to her.


For my own part I've never subscribed to the 'isn't she a wonderful and compassionate communicator' school of thought. While I have no desire to take easy pot shots at the woman, I've always thought she overplays her hand. Like a lot of people whose sense of self importance doesn't extend to a complementary sense of self awareness, she couldn't see when her behaviour descended into, at times, almost comical parody. Exhibit A would have to be her parading on the world stage the day after the Christchurch mosque massacre wearing a hijab. Far from displaying solidarity with the victims, to my somewhat jaundiced eye it was rather more a shrewd attempt to make political capital out of the event. And, what was even more dispiriting, it worked. The general public lapped it up. From that moment on a legend was born. The Jacinda Ardern juggernaut was on the move and there was no stopping it.


And look where we are today. A friend who has spent some time in the States recently tells me that, almost without exception, the two things that Americans know New Zealand for are Lord of the Rings and Jacinda Ardern. And both, one could argue, are the product of well lubricated publicity machines.


And similarly, people whose only information about her is derived from the image promoted by an almost entirely uncritical foreign media simply cannot believe that her feet are made of clay and her sudden resignation was prompted as much by self interest and a recognition by her that, as far as the New Zealand voting public was concerned, the game was up.


While self awareness may not be Dame Jacinda's long suit, self preservation certainly is. Hence we have the rather poignant situation of the only New Zealand Prime Minister who, after leaving office, chooses to live out of the country. Could there be a more eloquent testimony to her fall from grace? But because distance, as it so often does, lends enchantment to the view, her overseas reputation is seemingly undiminished. Her lustre is undimmed and the Jacinda legend lives on.


For this jaded scribe however it does make me question just how many of history's favourite sons and daughters have similarly been the product of carefully staged campaigns of unstinting praise and lavish adulation. And by the same token, how many of history's villains have been the object of ceaseless villification? My guess is plenty.


And so it may be that yet again we can learn from history. Or, in Dame Jacinda's case, earn from it.


Chris McVeigh is a retired KC living in Christchurch. He was previously President of the Canterbury District Law Society and, in an earlier life, a scriptwriter and performer for the satirical TV programme ‘A week of It’.

 
 
 

155 Comments


What is the point of criticizing Ms Ardern? Will it achive anything beneficial? She achieved here local political ambitions and has moved on.

We should "move on" as well.

She is no longer interested in New Zealand or us so why be so interested in her?

It would be more useful to understand what we might have learned from allowing her to govern and how to avoid similar mistakes. The lesson might be to think very carefully about who and what we vote for.

Like

j.mcobbald
6 days ago

Biggest joke Ive ever seen. Has to be a joke, doesnt it, really, please let it be a joke, I thought giving her a damehood was a joke, its getting better, maybe the jokes on us, is it a reflection of our education system, surely our country cant keep producing so many stupid people, we need help.

Like
zekewulfe
zekewulfe
6 days ago
Replying to

Yeah, unfortunate but that is the situation

Those that see it most clearly are those that are able to decipher the cancer within.


A malignant breed of the disease determined to promote its own survival

To great effect.....but not a joke... sadly

Edited
Like

Woodstack
Woodstack
6 days ago

An opportunist if ever I saw one, whether it be for fortune or fame, she is at the forefront.

How people thought she was the ducks nuts, I can never understand......it just shows us, plainly and clearly, that there are huge numbers out there that suck up publicity without question.....

She is in the money making game now and whatever it takes, she WILL take it...


Like

This comment was deleted.
ihcpcoro
ihcpcoro
6 days ago
Replying to

Rather ironical name 'trublu', is this labour AI humour perhaps?

Edited
Like

Bruce McKenzie
Bruce McKenzie
6 days ago

I never backed her as a leader from day 1. She was chosen when it became clear that Little was not going to attract the much needed votes for Labour. Her succession ensured support of probably 30% of women alone. It was politics trumping smarts and we could all see that when she was up against Judith Collins at a leadership debate.

And as for the "great communicator" moniker - I still don't understand what she stood for.. My one word in describing her, LIGHTWEIGHT.

Edited
Like
Bruce McKenzie
Bruce McKenzie
6 days ago
Replying to

Agree to that, Tallman. She was driven by being kind... with other. people's money.

Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page