top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

RODNEY HIDE: The limits of cleverness versus capitalism

2 hours ago
3 min read

The following column appeared in the NATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW October 27th 2017. With the support of Winston Peters, Jacinda Ardern had just been installed as Prime Minister.


The Limits of Cleverness versus Capitalism


I have concluded our new prime minister Jacinda Ardern is clever stupid.

She's quick, has good analytical skills and communicates well. There's no doubt she's clever.


But she's stupid on how the world works and lacks thought-through principles and values. She bobs along on feelings and sounding good and thereby perfectly in tune with a media that emotes rather than reports and analyses.


By her own account she grew up Mormon but jumped to socialism, becoming president of the International Union of Socialist Youth. She substituted one whacky religion for another. Her work experience is university and Parliament, first as a Labour Party staffer, then as an MP.


She's driven by belief, not understanding. She can't argue ideas and must dismiss her opponents as uncaring or not yet enlightened. The shortcoming in opposing ideas is not the ideas themselves but the moral deficiency of those expressing them.


When asked if capitalism had failed low-income New Zealanders, the prime minister-designate said: "If you have hundreds of thousands of children living in homes without enough to survive, that's a blatant failure. What else could could you describe it as?"


"Hundreds of thousands of children living in homes without enough to survive." That means "hundreds of thousands of children" dying because of material want. It's nonsense. There would be UN relief missions and international popstars having concerts to aid New Zealand were her claim true.


It isn't.


It's part of the media-manufactured Jacindamania that such rubbish claims are passed over. She cares, that's enough. It's as if her nonsensical hyperbole underscores the extent of her caring. "Yes, she might have been out by a few hundred children, and yes, they're not exactly not surviving, but her heart is in the right place."


The problem of poor and neglected children is not the fault of capitalism but of welfarism. Generations of handouts have robbed too many of any sense of personal responsibility even for the care and upbringing of their own children.


It's perfectly respectable now not to provide for yourself, nor house your family, nor commit in any way to your partner in child-making and to have children without the ability to provide or care or them.


It's not your fault. You're a victim. Capitalism has failed.


Ms Ardern's blinkered, if not blind, view of the world sees her advocating more of the policies causing the very problems concerning her rather than treating the cause.


No facts, no analysis, no experience would shift her view. Her socialism is her religion.


I'm a white, privileged male. I would say all of the above, wouldn't I ? I'm threatened by a female in charge and fear that my greedy exploitation of the poor is at an end. There, I dismissed my argument myself to save her supporters the effort.



Additional remarks by Lindsay Mitchell:


On the eve of the 2026 general election Ardern is no longer a factor.


But Carmel Sepuloni is.


As Minister for Social Development Sepuloni was responsible for scrapping the requirement for sole parent beneficiaries to name fathers; legislating for child support to be paid directly to sole parents as opposed to being kept to offset their benefit; numerous increases to family tax credits and benefit payment rates; reduction in sanctions for not meeting work obligations and introduction of the Best Start payment (now $77 weekly for newborns to age two).


Here's what happened - the population of under 18 year-olds grew by 4.6 percent while the number dependent on welfare grew by 25.7 percent. The increase for sole parent children was even higher at 30.5 percent:




If Labour and Sepuloni are returned to government, this time with the influence of the Greens and Te Pati Maori, how much worse will these numbers get?


 
 
 

10 Comments


Unknown member
12 minutes ago

100%

Adhern and her disciples were all fruitcakes.

Like

Unknown member
32 minutes ago

Spot on . Because the Left has learnt - universally - how to buy voters and starting as young and as poorly educated ( =indoctrinated) as possible.

A very powerful force today. Ignorance is super- dangerous.

Like

Unknown member
37 minutes ago

If I come across as an academic or socialist will I be excuded. I am neither, but nor do I believe 'in post hoc ergo propter fallacy' better known as 'tomatoes are fatal - everyone who eats them, dies.' If we ascribe numbers on support only to support policy, don't we miss the other causes, such as closure of industries, galloping inflation, loss of jobs, struggling retailers putting off staff. Do we lose good workers to Australia because they can't stand how much better life is on this side of the Tasman (really?).

Like

Unknown member
40 minutes ago

Nailed it Rodney. Socialism is a reliigion for those needing an altruistic ethics without theism. If facts could move socialists, 130 years history of socialistic experimentation across all continents, races, ethnicities with different religious histories, would have them abandoning it as an abject failure (which it has been - ask any AI). Instead, with few exceptions (I know of one or two individuals), socialists double down and insist that more of the same poison is needed to solve the problems welfarism has created. This is blind faith in a utopia few would want - if you examine it objectively. E.g. is equality of outcome REALLY what they/we want? Sport ceases to have meaning if all are equally talented. Everyone is…

Like

Unknown member
an hour ago

Amusing to discover JA now living in Sydney in a property she paid what? $6m? for, I guess the irony of her socialism is lost on her.

Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page