top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

RODNEY HIDE - Breaking news, 15 December: “He’s done it again!”

Mr Winston Peters remains New Zealand’s most enduring and adaptable political survivor. First elected to Parliament in 1978—just months after Sir Keith Holyoake resigned as Governor-General -- Mr Peters and Sir Keith bridge nearly a century of our parliamentary history. Sir Keith entered Parliament in 1932; together, these two men span the modern era. With his bearing and suits, Mr Peters would have slotted seamlessly into Sir Keith’s cabinet. Yet unlike the tuatara, frozen in its Jurassic adaptations, Mr Peters thrives in new terrain. He masters social media with a precision few politicians match, turning tweets into scalpel-sharp commentary.


His policy positions have evolved: the staunch Muldoonist became a fierce opponent of Rogernomics, a vocal critic of high immigration, a defender of the provinces, and a consistent opponent of woke social engineering. What endures is the core: fierce nationalism, instinctive appeal to the ordinary Kiwi, and deep scepticism toward intellectual elites and rapid societal overhaul. Mr Peters sells stability in turbulent times.


Current polling and voter fatigue suggest a strong performance for New Zealand First this election. Mr Chris Hipkins appears exhausted, and the public shares that weariness. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has failed to ignite broad enthusiasm. The Greens, ACT, and Māori Party each hit natural ceilings. Mr Peters is positioned to draw votes from across the spectrum -- particularly from National, and to a lesser extent Labour -- capitalising on discontent with the major parties.


History shows Mr Peters excels as kingmaker. He has supported National twice (under PM Jim Bolger and PM Christopher Luxon) and Labour twice (under PM Helen Clark and PM Jacinda Ardern). Despite his emphatic public denials, I predict he will ultimately coalesce with Labour after this election. They will offer the better deal, and Peters has never, ever allowed past statements to constrain his options.


Recall his campaign to remove National from power, only to prop them up. Or the famous “NO” billboard. Or his refusal of the “baubles of office,” only to serve as PM Helen Clark’s Foreign Minister outside Cabinet. Mr Peters can readily justify a Labour arrangement: the voters have spoken; Labour secured the largest share; keeping the Greens and Te Pāti Māori out preserves stability. Job done.


Commentators note New Zealand First’s candidate list leans centre-right. That observation misses the point. Mr Peters leads New Zealand First. Existing legislation allows him to manage caucus discipline effectively if needed.  Those who don’t support the government can be kicked out.


Two caveats apply. First, Mr Peters himself likely does not yet know his final destination -- he refuses negotiations until the votes are counted. Second, I hope New Zealand First candidate Mr Alfred Ngaro returns to Parliament. A principled and capable man, he would strengthen the House and serve the country well.


Mr Winston Peters embodies a persistent strain in New Zealand politics: distrust of overreach from Wellington elites and a preference for pragmatic nationalism. Whether one agrees with his worldview or not, his resilience and tactical skill command respect. As the votes come in, do not be surprised if the old campaigner once again holds the balance of power. In a fragmented Parliament, the tuatara that adapts survives.  And do not be surprised who he makes Prime Minister.  Unlike the tuatara, Mr Peters is never constrained by the past.


Rodney Hide is a former Minister and ACT party leader


 
 
 

72 Comments


howarddxx
an hour ago

Rodney Hyde endorses Winston Peters, who sold us to the horrible two faced lying Jack enda. If he is a king maker again, it will show that the Kiwi voters have never been constrained by the memory of the past either. Losers, making a loser, who makes New Zealand a loser. New Zealand would be better off if he moved to Australia.

Edited
Like

Gerard
Gerard
an hour ago

My thoughts about Winston are that ultimately he wants to be PM and will do whatever he needs to succeed. So in spite of his black and white statements he will go with Labour but on the condition he is PM.

I do like the idea of Winnie as PM - a real politician, one with a backbone, not afraid of hard decisions, one who doesn't suffer fools. How long since we had one of those???!!! And I do think Hipkins would allow that - to save himself some face, to be back in (some sort of) power.

On the other hand, I desperately want Hipkins to go. If he ever was a force, he is a spent one. Not…

Edited
Like

Unknown member
an hour ago

In short , Winston Peters is driven SOLELY by his lust for personal position and power for Winston Peters . His stated policies are all directed at garnering votes to give him the bargaining power to realise that personal purpose regardless of claimed political affiliations . Principles don’t count —- ONLY the outcome for himself . Who would ever trust him .

Hugh Perrett

Like
ihcpcoro
ihcpcoro
an hour ago
Replying to

And Ardern wasn't?

Aren't they all the same?

Ameni

Like

Martin Baker
Martin Baker
an hour ago

I find it ironic in many ways that NZ First and ACT are so damn close in many policies i would like to see them merge after Winny and SJ leave they would be a real force then

Like
roger
roger
an hour ago
Replying to

Surely you understand the Winston could NEVER share anything such as the leadership with anyone else. He failed to support ACT's Treaty Principles Bill which was the easiest and the most elegant way to solve that particular problem.

Like

charlie.baycroft
2 hours ago

The great thing about Democracy is that every citizen can be as involved and influential in a political party as she or he wishes to. The sad thing is that the majority complain, criticize, c0mplain and do nothing but maube vote for more "free stuff". The precise numbers are never disclosed but `there are probably only around 50.000 political members in total. A few are active and have some influence. Even less have positions of authority and real influence.

Regardless of which parties and their candidates are elected, the decisions that effect us all will be made by that small minority of most influential party members and financial supporters for their benefit and at our expense. Politics is a game like any other in s…

Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page