top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

PETER WILLIAMS: Who can be a racist?

It's not about ethnicity. It's about your politics.


In my not entirely successful career as a radio talk show host, a few encounters remain fresh in the memory.


One was with former Te Tai Tokerau MP Hone Harawira during the time of the Ihumatao land occupation near Auckland Airport in 2019.


You’ll remember Fletcher Building bought the land off a farmer and planned to build about 500 houses on it, including some set aside especially for members of local iwi.


But some Maori protested the sale and the plans, because they believed it was Maori land and should be returned to Maori, although which Maori has never been successfully resolved.


Seven years on there’s still no housing there. It’s a testament to government incompetence.


The protest became very messy with police at one stage attempting to forcibly remove the occupiers.


One of the more staunch of the protestors was Anikaaro Harawira-Havili. During the protest she told a uniformed and sworn officer of the New Zealand Police to “f**k off back to your own country.”


That police officer was of Indian ethnicity.


During my interview with Hone Harawira, he admitted the utterer of the infamous comment was his daughter, he was proud of her and what she said wasn’t racist.


Hmm.


That’s because, according to Hone, Maori cannot be racists in their own country.


So on that score what Winston Peters said in Parliament last week to Green MP Lawrence Xu-nan cannot possibly be racist because Winston is Maori and he’s in his own country.


But Winston is a conservative heterosexual politician. Mr Xu-nan is gay and leans politically to the far left. So therefore he mustn’t be insulted, especially by an old man like Winston Peters.


In reality what both Ms Harawira and the Foreign Minister said in their respective forums was despicable and out of order. Nobody whose a New Zealand citizen or permanent resident deserves to be spoken to in that manner.


Anybody who commits to New Zealand through a career in law enforcement like the Indian police officer or political service like the Green MP should feel immensely insulted by both Harawira’s and Peters’ comments.


However this is a country where freedom of speech is an absolute right. The right to freely express opinions, insult and offend others AND to be offended and insulted by those opinions is inherent in the Bill of Rights Act.


But being offended and being insulted is no reason for people to lose jobs or lose rights or freedoms, unless that offense or insult is inciting violence.


Which is pretty close to what the Migrant Workers Association of Aotearoa were doing with the mock execution of an effigy of Peters in Auckland on Saturday.


They didn’t like what Peters said to Xu-nan so Peters had to be for the chop.


The MWAA, as exposed by Ani O’Brien, is a collection of ardent lefty union activists like Joe Carolan and Mike Treen with a close association to Green MP Ricardo Menendez March.


It’s very name suggests it backs the rights of migrant workers in New Zealand to not be insulted or offended.


I don’t know whether they existed in 2019. Even if they did I could never imagine them holding a mock execution of Anikaaro Harawira-Havili.


Because she has a right to be racist – even to a migrant worker.


But Winston doesn't.


It’s a weird world.


Writer and broadcaster for half a century. Now watching from the sidelines. Subscribe to Peter William's Substack here

 
 
 

47 Comments


Woodstack
Woodstack
4 hours ago

The meaning of racist does not give maori any exemption, so therefore they, as any other group of people, can be racist.

Lets get real and don't except the bs that maori have special rights and then country would be far better off and we could all move on and share EQUAL RIGHTS, without the 'colour factor' being the divider.

I, for one, am sick and tired of the overuse of the word racist.

Like
Chris L
an hour ago
Replying to

Māori should have no special rights over and above if any are guaranteed in the treaty or in our legislation.

Edited
Like

Octavian Augustus
Octavian Augustus
11 hours ago

Recognising distinctions and having ingroup preference is not bigoted. I'd imagine all of us recognise the distinction between family and non-family, and have a preference for the former. It doesn't follow that we "hate" the latter or want to see them harmed - it just means they aren't our priority.


"Racism" is White people recognising racial distinctions and having White ingroup preference. For some reason, this is presented as the greatest moral failing of our age. Why? Animus towards Europeans. On this definition, non-White people cannot be "racist" even though though have the natural ingroup preference that has been propagandised out of European Man to lower his defences. The best response is to not care if anyone is racist, including…

Like
ihcpcoro
ihcpcoro
6 hours ago
Replying to

True Tall Man.

Having lived in a predominently Maori area, as a 'minority', racism ain't just a 'white' thing.

But at the time, it was not an issue.

If anybody, of any ethnicity stepped over 'the line', they were very swiftly told to efffoff.

Today, let those enlightened, plastic tiki wearing, luvvies from (predominently, I reckon) Wellington, spend 6 months in the Ureweras, for example, and see how long their 'world view' , 'best practice' and 'evidence based' theories hold up.

About 2 days, I'd say.

Ameni


Like

Brian Marshall
Brian Marshall
12 hours ago

I disagree with the comment that Winston’s remark about the foreign born MP is despicable. I don’t want any foreign born people in our Parliament. The Green Party seems to indulge in a large number of foreign born communists telling us how we should run our country. I have a hard time with foreign born people telling me my country should change at the best of times.

Like

Farmer C.
13 hours ago

"Are you vaccinated?"

That was the question that annoyed Peters and so he attacked the questioner's ethnicity.

The breathtaking hypocrisy of the left doesn't alter the fact that Winston Peters, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, resorted to delivering a racist response to a question he didn't like.

It pisses me off that he foolishly gives ammunition to those who wish to cast the entire multi-party movement that seeks one law for all in New Zealand, as racist.


Edited
Like

KiwiResistance
19 hours ago

According to evolutionary biology & psychology, being discriminatory 24/7 on many levels, just comes naturally.


Such adaptions over millions of years, which include instantaneous subjective racial profiling & ancestral memories, are crucial for the moment to moment survival of each & every one of us.


So who is a racist, well in a deeper, sense I am & so is every other human being on our planet. Of course in the one dimensional (shallow) emotive, braindead woke world, such words have been weaponised & thereby (like bugger) they've lost all meaning or impact.


So

Like
KiwiResistance
4 hours ago
Replying to

Of course it is, thats supposedly what his party stands for, putting kiwis first & our nation first. I unfortunately I do have my doubts about this as he's a very wily, profesional politician & who, in their right mind trusts such people? Not me, that's for sure.


So bugger off back to where you hail from Farmer C, a farm perhaps, just exercising my right to free speech which is still allowed. I really hope I haven't hurt your precious feelings though.

Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page