LINDSAY MITCHELL: Hipkins' play for the Maori seats
Updated: Aug 30
Yesterday Labour promised to reinstate the Maori Trades and Training Fund (MTTF) at a cost of $21 million annually. The fund was initially set up as part of the post COVID recovery spend. National later cut it to economise.
It's part of the 'by Maori, for Maori' kaupapa so is run by maraes and iwi for mostly Maori participants. Reinstated, it will be exclusively for Maori. An evaluation of the scheme was generally positive.
To get them into work or upskill them into better work, the spend on each participant was "from $19,116 (excluding wage subsidies) in 2020/21 to $10,510 in 2023/24"
Based on the scheme's numbers to date I would estimate that Labour's budgeting to spend $21,000 on 1,000 participants annually.
How many Maori are unemployed right now? Just under 50,000 are on a Jobseeker - Work Ready benefit and a further 39,000 are on a sole parent benefit. Both of the numbers are the highest of any ethnicity including European.
So aren't these high numbers a good reason to 'invest' more in reducing them?
No. They are a good reason to stop spending billions on benefits which have led to a collapse of work ethic, an indifference (if not disdain) for education and inter-generational dependence on hand-outs.
That's what Labour has to get its head around. This policy is yet another go at putting out a bushfire with a watering can.
But no. Hipkins is openly using this hook to reel in the Maori electorates. Announcing the policy yesterday, he made his play:
"Today we launched our Māori campaign..... And we're fighting to win all seven Māori electorates - with strong Māori voices in Parliament, grounded in their communities and fighting for the future their whānau deserve."
Then he blathered on about honouring te tiriti, tikanga Maori being "part of who we are" and wanting his kids to grow up bilingual.
What this signals is Labour's intention to resurrect and press on with a separatist agenda. Buying Maori votes with spending that doesn't make sense from any viewpoint. It doesn't make good economic sense. It puts the cart before the horse, and it is racially based.
Historically, it has been Labour's creation and constant expansion of welfare that has made Maori more prone to unemployment and family breakdown. Apirana Ngata predicted the problem when high family benefits started to flow into East Coast communities. Today thousands of Maori children grow up in workless, fatherless homes and we wonder why its hard to get them into the workforce?
Meanwhile, at every election, Labour promises to solve the problems of its own making. And sadly, many Maori keep believing the promise.
How can this be called racism? It is not discriminating against Māori, it is providing them to learn new skills, get experience, or get a qualification. Perhaps highlight MSD’s schemes where they help the unemployed pay the bills while they train or study, and help them get a job after.
Sending crap after crap, if it looks like crap it probably is crap.
Just a suggestion. Here is a summary for anyone who does not wish to or cannot read my explanation for it. IMO, the most logical, practical, legal and effective means of demonstrating our annoyance, disappointment and distrust of the people we call the government is to GO BACK TO HOLDING AND USING CASH before "they" stop us from being able to do it. We go to work and sell our time and labour (much of our lives) for income we do not get to own, hold and spend as we choose. Fact. "New Zealand employees have the legal right to be paid in cash under the Wages Protection Act 1983 unless they work for the government or a local authority." Did anyone tell you about that?
Employers divert…
It doesn't sound right, does it? - just rearranging the deck chairs on the port side, when it's all done and dusted.
Female voters will decide this election, but it's hardly a demographic that this little boy will appeal to, with his track record.
What bloody shambles the so called opposition are.
There must be a better quality pool of social misfits to tempt into the fold, and stand for parliament, surely?
Probably not - but that's the boot in the arse that national needs right now.
Our parliament has never been of such an overall, pitiful and concerning standard - the Globe is a more appropriate name for the place.
Ameni
Oh, the irony, the irony! It drips upon us like blood from a left wing carcass.