top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

DON BRASH: A "House of Iwi Lords"? Te Pāti Māori’s radical plan exposed

Sep 7
3 min read

The following is written in Don's capacity as Hobson's Pledge Trustee


Te Pāti Māori's latest proposal is unlikely to become law. However, with all the ongoing talk about the importance of the Treaty and racial preferences by the Labour Party, Green Party, and TOP, we cannot totally rule it out.



As I write, there is no parliamentary majority for it, and most New Zealanders would reject it outright.


But that's not the point.


The real significance of this latest announcement is that it exposes just how radical Te Pāti Māori's constitutional vision has become.


Their proposal would make Waitangi Tribunal findings binding on governments, create a powerful new Treaty Commission, and place increasing constraints on the ability of elected representatives to govern.


For many New Zealanders, this confirms what has long been suspected and what Hobson’s Pledge have been warning for a long time: Te Pāti Māori is no longer simply arguing for greater recognition of Māori interests within our democracy.


It is advocating for a fundamentally different political system, one that is not democratic.


Instead, they want power to transfer from democratically elected Members of Parliament to unelected iwi activists.


In effect, a House of Iwi Lords!


The Waitangi Tribunal was established as a commission of inquiry that makes recommendations. Te Pāti Māori wants those recommendations to become binding on future governments.


This means any future government is not actually in control. The Tribunal is!


Hobson's Pledge have already been calling for an end to the Waitangi Tribunal. Its power and influence have gone well beyond its original purpose, and now acts solely as a voice for activists and a brake on democratic governance.


To make it the final arbiter of New Zealand laws simply confirms the need to get rid of the Tribunal now.


Our democracy is based on equal voting and equality before the law. Or at least it should be.


We already know it is not perfect, with separate Māori seats and too many examples of people being treated differently according to their ancestry to list here, be it in the health system, education, or more.


Our democracy is based on us electing people to represent us in Parliament. What Te Pāti Māori and its activist allies want is power to move to unelected commissions, tribunals, and iwi activists.


In a democracy, governments are elected by the people and can be removed by the people. The ultimate authority rests with voters.


If decision-making shifted away from voters, tribal authorities would gain unprecedented power over public policy. They already hold significant influence, but Te Pāti Māori wants even more.


Te Pāti Māori wants political and constitutional power to be based on ancestry and tribal status rather than democratic consent.


We must remain committed to a democratically elected Parliament. It is why we must also continue to call for an end to the Waitangi Tribunal as well as the Māori seats; they are incompatible with a democracy based on everyone being equal.


It is tempting to just ignore Te Pāti Māori as fringe and, on current polling, unlikely to retain all the seats they once held. But this misses the point – they are just part of a wider political landscape of parties obsessed with the supposed primacy of the Treaty and race-based decision-making.


Political parties often reveal their true ambitions when they think beyond what is immediately achievable. This policy tells New Zealanders exactly what kind of country Te Pāti Māori would like to create if given the opportunity.


For those of us who firmly believe in one person, one vote, equal citizenship, and a Parliament accountable to all New Zealanders equally, this announcement serves as an important reminder of what is at stake at this election.


It is not just Te Pāti Māori but all those parties that align with this Treaty-centric and divisive view.


We are one people. We believe in equal rights.


Let’s ensure that at this election we keep it that way.

 
 
 

71 Comments


Unknown member
Sep 09

 Brash's oft quoted "one person, one vote" is already the standard for our democracy, yet he implies that it's only some that firmly believe in it. I haven't heard claims that some people get more than one vote. People on the Maori roll only get one vote the same as for everybody else. They can only vote in one electorate and all the same political parties have the opportunity to stand in a Maori electorate.

Like

Unknown member
Sep 08

Treaty of Waitangi has relevance however isn’t it about time that politicians had a spine or respect for the laws of the land .

Treaty shouldn’t be used as red tape to obstruct progress for 83 % of the people of NZ.

Why shouldn’t the majority rule, instead we have the bizarre situation where govt and laws are being overlooked to favour the minority at taxpayers expense

Like

Unknown member
Sep 08

Dr Brash condemns "race based decision making" on the premise that this is the objective of Treaty centric fringe Parties? But this misses the point.

Race based decision making is and has been the domain of the racial ancestry from which he descends, since George Grey [ later Knighted for Service to Empire ] became Governor General.


Maori signed up to "same rights and privileges" yet a mere 12 years after Te Tiriti was signed, Grey unilaterally imposed the Constitution Act. Given its novel foreign origin, its concept of the people, by the people, for the people, its profound constitutional departure from Te Tiriti and that Maori outnumbered Pakeha by 40 to 1, one might have expected widespread consultation, explanation…


Like

Unknown member
Sep 08

It makes me wonder : if Te Pati Maori's wildest dreams are realised, and they are running the country by 2040, how long would it take for their tribalism to fractionate, and for long-standing grievances to start surfacing? For example Te Arawa descendants may seek redress against Ngapuhi for the slaughter on Mokoia Island in 1823.

Leaders from each tribe met in 2007 to end the 184-year-old conflict. A taiaha was returned to Te Arawa, and all was forgiven. But was this peace-making effort akin to a "Full and Final Treaty Settlement"? We've seen what happens with those...


Like

Unknown member
Sep 08

Just to give you idea of what to expect from tribal rule, here is a Facebook post by one of the special race when her opinion and "facts" are questioned. I have cleaned up the language but I think the gist gets through.


"Vorne Wheki

 ·

The only fuckn stupid cxxxx are you ignorant uneducated albino swamp monkeys.We know we were not called Maaori until you albino swamp monkeys got here because you fxxxxd up albino swamp monkeys just love putting things into little categories just to make you cxxxs feel superior.

We are Ngaati n we know damn well who we are.We dont need no fxxxxd up albino swamp monkey trying to tell us.

We Maaori were unified for…


Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page